Sunday, February 19, 2017

The Price of Perfection (Sermon)


“The Price of Perfection”
Matthew 5:38-48
Allen Huff
Jonesborough Presbyterian Church
2/19/17

         In 1999, theologian Walter Wink published a book entitled The Powers That Be: Theology for the New Millennium. The centerpiece of this book is the author’s research on the historical context of Matthew 5:38-42. Wink concludes that Jesus’ instructions about turning the other cheek, giving away both coat and cloak, and going the exstra mile are not about capitulating to evildoers and bullies. In fact, says Wink, Jesus teaches just the opposite.
To understand Wink’s interpretation of turning the other cheek it helps to visualize. Imagine yourself standing face-to-face with someone who, for whatever reason, becomes physically aggressive and strikes you on the right cheek. According to Walter Wink, this scenario implies a relationship between people of higher and lower social standing. For two reasons the blow to the right cheek of a person of lower standing must be accomplished with the back of the aggressor’s right hand. First, in ancient Palestine, the left hand is a person’s bathroom hand. It would disgrace even the aggressor to hit with that hand. Second, to hit with a right hand, is to acknowledge an opponent as a social equal. A right-handed backhand to a right cheek both rebukes and belittles.
“Turn the other cheek” means offer the left cheek. Dare the aggressor to humiliate himself by slapping you with his left hand, or to acknowledge you as an equal by hitting you with a right cross.
The courtroom scenario does a similar thing. Wink says that Jesus’ hearers would understand him advising to strip naked in a public place, thus embarrassing the one who has taken you to court. And going the extra mile has to do with a law allowing Roman soldiers to draft peasants to carry their gear. That law, however, limited the conscription to one mile. The illegal extra mile puts a soldier at risk of shameful discipline by his superior officer.1
Many people, myself included, jumped on Wink’s bandwagon. The idea of sticking it to The Man holds far more appeal than simply getting slapped around. The more I’ve thought about it, though, the more it seems that Wink’s theories make some assumptions that sidestep contingencies in the scenarios, not to mention the deep and disrupting scandal of the gospel.
Throughout the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus challenges us to live lives of justice. And God’s justice isn’t about punishing wrongdoers. It’s not about getting even. God’s justice is about setting things right. It’s about restoration and reunion. Please, don’t hear me saying that justice means getting “back to the way things used to be.” There’s never been a time when all was “right.” And if future generations are to know peace, we must help by working for it today. Restorative justice is a way of life, a gift handed down. Doing holy justice means taking what feels like unjustified initiative to love with the radical, restoring love of Jesus. And he throws us straight into the hard stuff.
“Love your enemy,” says Jesus. Anyone can love those who love them back. Loving those who don’t love you, though, loving your enemies, that Love does justice, loves kindness, and walks humbly with God.
Then, in what sounds like a moment of spiritual pique, Jesus says, Look, you all have to be perfect. Just like God is perfect.
Perfect? Seriously?
The Greek word is teleios, and it is variously translated as perfect, mature, complete, full grown. Eugene Peterson’s translation of this verse is helpful. “In a word,” says Jesus, “what I’m saying is, Grow up. You’re kingdom subjects. Now live like it. Live out your God-created identity. Live generously and graciously toward others, the way God lives toward you.” (Mt. 5:48, The Message)
The call to recognize and live out our “God-created identity” took me back to our book study conversation last Wednesday night. We are reading The Book of Creation: An Introduction to Celtic Spirituality by Philip Newell. The chapter under discussion had to do with the image of God as understood in the ancient and quietly enduring disciplines of Celtic Christianity.
Most of us who were raised by the western church were taught that at The Fall, we lost all trace of our holiness. We are born out of and into iniquity. It is our defining reality. According to this theory, original sin, God was so deeply offended by human sin that God cannot forgive, that God is, in fact, powerless to forgive, except through some satisfying act of retribution. So, God sends Jesus, the righteous one, to atone, by substitution, for our sins.
Let that sink in. For generations, the Church has been preaching the love of a God who can be satisfied only by the savage torture and execution of an innocent person. When that is our image of God, and thus the image in which we are made, how will we treat each other? Specifically, how will we treat those whom we label enemy?
The ancient Celtic tradition teaches something different.
“To say that we are made in the image of the divine,” says Philip Newell, “is to say that what is deepest in us is…the love…wisdom…creativity, imagination, and wildness of God.”2
What is most essential and primordial in humankind, then, is not iniquity and brokenness, but a mystical wholeness. We are made in the image of creative, transforming, eternal Love. And when that is our image of God, and thus the image in which we are made, perhaps we will treat each other differently.
“No one is to be regarded merely as an object,” says Newell, “for at heart each woman and man is a holy mystery.”3
Jesus saves us not by satisfying God’s need for violent retribution, but by fully revealing who God is and, therefore, who we are, regardless of what it costs him to do so.
Our sin is real, of course. We’re far from perfect. We prefer a God who allows us to feel fear, judgment, and vengeance toward others. The price of perfection has to do with dying to whatever false self we have willfully created – or dutifully accepted – and embracing a God who desires that we experience and reunite with the holy love, wisdom, creativity, imagination, wildness, and mystery that lies at the heart of the Creation. Only when we accept that God lies at the heart of all things can we even begin to imagine what it might mean to love our enemies as Jesus loved those who opposed him, ridiculed him, and killed him.
Remember, too, loving our enemies doesn’t mean “tolerating” them. Tolerance implies a distance and a perceived sense of superiority over the one tolerated. We can both tolerate and exploit someone.
To love means to listen and to speak, to share stories, to want to understand. It means to be in relationship. It means to hold on, at all costs, to the conviction that beneath all that seems threatening, off-putting, and just plain wrong about someone, he or she holds a promise of blessing for us because that person carries, deep inside, the very same stuff that lies at the heart of our own being – the essence of God.
A truly humble, patient, and grateful faith. That is the price of perfection.

1I could not find my copy of this book for specific page references. The Powers That Be: Theology for the New Millennium, was published in 1999 by Doubleday. The Cokesbury website lists two ISBN numbers: ISBN 10: 0385487525; ISBN 13: 9780385487528.
2J. Philip Newell, The Book of Creation: An Introduction to Celtic Spirituality. Paulist Press, New York-Mahawah, NJ, 1999. P.84.
3Ibid. p. 84.

No comments:

Post a Comment